http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/36/9/1624.abstract?sid=248e0c00-c550-4739-83bb-afc36d38800d

  1. Jane M. Zhu1,*,
  2. Yuehan Zhang2 and
  3. Daniel Polsky3

Abstract

There is increasing concern about the extent to which narrow-network plans, generally defined as those including fewer than 25 percent of providers in a given health insurance market, affect consumers’ choice of and access to specialty providers—particularly in mental health care. Using data for 2016 from 531 unique provider networks in the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces, we evaluated how network size and the percentage of providers who participate in any network differ between mental health care providers and a control group of primary care providers. Compared to primary care networks, participation in mental health networks was low, with only 42.7 percent of psychiatrists and 19.3 percent of nonphysician mental health care providers participating in any network. On average, plan networks included 24.3 percent of all primary care providers and 11.3 percent of all mental health care providers practicing in a given state-level market. These findings raise important questions about provider-side barriers to meeting the goal of mental health parity regulations: that insurers cover mental health services on a par with general medical and surgical services. Concerted efforts to increase network participation by mental health care providers, along with greater regulatory attention to network size and composition, could improve consumer choice and complement efforts to achieve mental health parity.

Comment;

Rush Limbaugh said it best; “follow the money”.  Managed care in general is a scam; put a ravenously hungry 800 lb gorilla between patient and provider to save money??  Seriously??

Dr. Raymond Oenbrink
Latest posts by Dr. Raymond Oenbrink (see all)